Thursday, May 1, 2008

Alleged Media Bias Against Clinton

I know solidarity has questioned my right to comment at all, since I'm not a Democrat, but I'm gonna anyway. I hope that you, pdrez or anyone else harboring the misguided notion that the media is biased against Hillary has, at long last, disabused yourself of that falsehood. Have you observed the coverage of the Wright distraction? Have you observed the campaign analyses since PA? The bias allegation always was B.S. I hope you can acknowledge that now. All the whining about how the media said only Clinton couldn't win enough delegates was completely bogus. Every story I read or watched said neither could win sufficient delegates. It wasn't the media that was suggesting it might be time for Clinton to fold her tent. It was party folks. Get off the media's back and tell your candidate to take responsiblity for her own actions, as hard as that might be for a Clinton.

Peace through sniper fire in Bosnia and opposition to NAFTA.


solidarity said...

To argue that them mass media has been fair or balanced through out this campaign just because finally in April 2008, it finally turned it attention to looking at BO is almost laughable. Even the MSM is now admitting its past bias toward BO. After months and months of passing on stories, ignoring its obligation to investigate candidates, their positions, and their history, the media finally began to address the true BO. A little too late, and a little too little.

Peace through god-damning America, and clinging to bibles, guns and xenophobia in middle America.

tom dresslar said...

BO. I like that.