The delegate numbers may be against Hillary, but, those same numbers are also against Obama. The simple fact is that neither Obama nor Clinton currently has enough delegate votes to win the nomination and neither will have enough next week, or next month, or in June. Neither Clinton nor Obama has been able to convince enough voters or caucus goers to take a majority of delegates, and neither will have enough pledged delegates to win the nomination by the time this primary season is over in early June.
Just as important, from all accounts, this extended race is bringing in many,many new voters to the Democratic Party in PA, which bodes extremely well for our party and our country come November.
Yes, Obama currently leads in pledged delegates (but it is well-know that he will not carry enough to Denver to win), and he leads in the so-called popular vote. But, by how much. According to RealClearPolitics, his current lead is less than 3% if you do not count FL or MI. If you count FL then his lead dwindles to 1.4%. (Yes, I will count FL for two simple reasons, it is the right thing to do and the DNC's ruling only strips delegates not the popular vote. Floridians count as much as any other people in the popular vote, and more so in November as a swing state).
It also looks more and more likely that Clinton will close, and perhaps overtake some of the present pledged delegate and popular vote gap with expected primary victories in PA, KY, WV and PR, and maybe IN.
And, Clinton leads in electoral votes, which are what counts in the general election.
Both Obama and Clinton will need a lot of so-called superdelegate votes to win the nomination, and both are campaigning for them. It is totally legitimate for both to do so. Those are also the rules.
So, let's just all relax. Let's not be afraid of the process and the voters. Let's welcome all those new voters and new Dems. Let's not be afraid. Let's continue.
1 comment:
Couldn't agree more. The Obama campaign and its surrogates can claim premature victory, but the bottom line is that both he and Clinton cannot achieve the magic number of 2,024 pledged delegates by the end of this primary season. There is still a lot to play for, and Clinton is well within her rights to continue the race.
Regarding the electoral vote which I have been seeing many pro-Clinton supporters citing, I feel like this argument is a little misguided. As the NY Times article states, taking the large electoral jackpots like California and NY from Obama, because he will surely win these states in November. So the electoral math is misleading as an argument for her to win the nomination.
Post a Comment